
- LETTERS ON PHONE KEYPAD FOR ANDROID
- LETTERS ON PHONE KEYPAD BLUETOOTH
- LETTERS ON PHONE KEYPAD WINDOWS
The Arteck HB066 isn't quite as elegant as that long-dead device, but it comes awfully close. You may remember the unique four-way folding mechanism in the Think Outside Stowaway, a keyboard that enjoyed a cult following back in the Palm Pilot era. That’s a big plus, as you don’t have to retrain your fingers to find and press the different-sized keys found on keyboards with straight hinges. Unlike some other folding keyboards, the zig-zagging design of the hinge fits around the keys, so all of the letter keys are the same size. That’s an acceptable compromise to make the keyboard more portable, and the rest of it is pretty comfortable to type on.

The letter keys are the same size as the Plugable's keys, but here on the Arteck, the cursor keys are smaller and you don’t get a dedicated row of function keys along the top. It’s on the smaller side about the size of a typical smartphone when folded up. The HB066 ( Rating: 8/10, WIRED Recommends) is another three-panel design, where two side panels fold out from the center to form the keyboard surface. But if you're looking to type comfortably, this one serves up too much wasted space.
LETTERS ON PHONE KEYPAD WINDOWS
So, the Jelly Comb keyboard might appeal to those using Windows devices, or those spending a lot of time remotely controlling a desktop computer from a phone. For Apple users, the appalling mouse support in iOS 13 means the touchpad doesn’t really add much to the iPhone or iPad.
LETTERS ON PHONE KEYPAD FOR ANDROID
Plus, while the presence of the touchpad is a plus for Windows devices, it's superfluous for Android users. The touchpad is also smaller than most laptop touchpads, which makes precise maneuvering more difficult. The other keys are decently sized and have a pleasant feel with a good amount of vertical travel. The wide hinges mean that some of the keys are much smaller than others: The t and v, for instance, are half the size of other keys and it is easy to hit the bulge of the hinge rather than the keys next to it. While the design is neat, it has some serious downsides.
LETTERS ON PHONE KEYPAD BLUETOOTH
It supports Bluetooth 3 and is compatible with Android, iOS, Windows, and Mac devices. It’s a neat little folding keyboard that folds down to about the same size as the Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ I used in my tests. This keyboard from Jelly Comb ( Rating: 6/10) is the only keyboard I looked at that includes a touchpad. None of these choices are as comfortable to use as a full-size keyboard, though, so be prepared to compromise some luxury in the name of portability. My top pick was the Arteck HB066 Bluetooth Keyboard ( $27 at Amazon), a small keyboard that combines a nice foldable design with a consistent key size and a layout that will immediately feel comfortable. I also only tested models that work with both Android and iOS devices. I looked at five keyboards, and I stuck with foldable models that collapse down to about the same size as a smartphone. Pair one of these tiny keyboards with Google Docs or the mobile version of Microsoft Word, and you’ve got a desktop word-processing experience in your pocket. These devices are cheap, portable, and make typing on the hoof a far more pleasant experience. This pain can be lessened by adding a small keyboard to your mobile kit. Typing with your thumbs (or even swipe typing) for long stretches becomes a screen-slipping nightmare, because tryping on a scrn is not a gr8 exprnce. Here's mine: DECLARE VARCHAR(MAX)='' WITH t AS(SELECT i UNION ALL SELECT t WHERE i96THEN 20-c/122+5*c/16 ELSE c END)FROM t SELECT uses a recursive CTE to make an impromptu stack of the characters in the phone number and translate the letters on the fly, then a bit of SQL trickery (SELECT to recompose the string from the CTE without requiring another recursion construct.Your phone is a computing marvel-until you need to type anything longer than a sentence on it. Go up-vote him, it's an elegant solution! However, mattnewport's rational approach works in SQL as well, at a much lower cost of bytes, so I am shamelessly scrapping my own math in favor of his.

It had a ridiculous number of decimal places in the coefficients, but it worked. I spent quite some time over the past couple of nights painstakingly creating a mathematical sequence function that would round correctly to generate the proper ASCII codes for the numbers from the alphabetical ASCII codes. Non-ASCII 8-bit input will produce all sorts of weird numeric output.Īfter all this, it's a bit disappointing that this only beats the trivial bash solution by just six chars. GolfScript, 24 chars (which are mapped to the two-character string 10).
